MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084119956 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.089

Globotriaosyl ceramide receptor function – Where membrane structure and pathology intersect

2009· review· en· W2084119956 on OpenAlexafffund
Clifford A. Lingwood, Beth Binnington, Adam Manis, Donald R. Branch

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario HIV Treatment NetworkCanadian Foundation for AIDS Research
KeywordsGlycosphingolipidCeramideGlycolipidLipid raftBiologyGene isoformCell biologyMembraneMoietyReceptorBiochemistryChemistryGeneStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The glycosphingolipid globotriaosyl ceramide, (Galalpha1-4Galss1-4 glucosyl ceramide-Gb(3)) also known as CD77 and the P(k) blood group antigen, is bound by both verotoxins and by the HIV adhesin, gp120. Gb(3) plays an important receptor role in VT induced hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and HIV infection. The organization of glycolipids, including Gb(3), into lipid rafts is central to both pathologies. The fatty acid heterogeneity within the Gb(3) lipid moiety plays a central role in assembly within such ordered domains. Differential binding of verotoxins and gp120 to such Gb(3) isoforms in model and cell membranes indicates a significant role in the eventual pathogenic outcome. HUS may provide the first example whereby membrane Gb(3) organization provides a predictor for tissue selective in vivo pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations120
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicLipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207