Artists-Museums Collaborations: Current Research and Future Trends in Ancient Drama Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents a current case of art based research that draws on museum exhibits, namely ancient Greek drama masks. The author, artist Magda Roussi, discusses the way in which museum artifacts are transformed via research into art work that enhances and diffuses new knowledge about Ancient Greek drama (in particular about ways concerned with the creation and use of masks and costumes in ancient drama, that is contributing in the revival of knowledge about these issues). The paper focuses on examples of masks and costumes that were created as a result of this process, tracing the transformation of museum artifacts into scholarly research via the mediation of art based research and practice. The paper draws on parts of work already presented at the Canadian Institute in Greece following an invitation to the artist to give a public lecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.024 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.028 | 0.031 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".