MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084157458 · doi:10.1063/1.4811482

Distinguishing spin pumping from spin rectification in a Pt/Py bilayer through angle dependent line shape analysis

2013· article· en· W2084157458 on OpenAlexaff
Lihui Bai, Zheng Feng, Paul Hyde, Haifeng Ding, C.‐M. Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRectificationBilayerCondensed matter physicsSpin pumpingSpin (aerodynamics)Ferromagnetic resonanceMagnetic fieldMicrowaveMaterials scienceFerromagnetismSpin Hall effectVoltageSpin polarizationPhysicsChemistryElectronMagnetization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pure spin current driven by spin pumping is converted to a DC voltage and detected electrically in a Py/Pt bilayer sample. This DC voltage mixes with a DC voltage produced through spin rectification. The ferromagnetic resonance line shape strongly depends on the microwave magnetic h field distribution. We have systematically studied the line shapes by changing the external magnetic field orientation in plane of a Pt/Py bilayer. A method is demonstrated which allows us to calculate the microwave h field vector distribution, and distinguish spin pumping from spin rectification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207