MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Soil Physicochemical and Biological Interfacial Interactions in the Rhizosphere: Impacts on Food Security and Ecosystem Integrity

2008· article· es· W2084161829 on OpenAlexafffund
Peisheng Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de la ciencia del suelo y nutrición vegetal · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRhizosphereEcosystemEnvironmental scienceSoil waterFood chainTerrestrial ecosystemSoil organic matterVegetation (pathology)EcologySoil scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The soil root interface (the rhizosphere) plays a vital role in sustaining life in the terrestrial ecosystem in the Earth’s Critical Zone (CZ). The CZ is defined as the volume extending from the upper limit of vegetation down to the lower limit of groundwater (Anderson et al., 2004). The CZ is the system of coupled chemical, biological, physical, and geological processes operating together to support life at the Earth’s surface (Brantley et al., 2007). While our understanding of this zone has increased over the last hundred years, further advance requires scientists to cross disciplines and scales to integrate understanding of processes in the CZ, ranging in scale from the mineral-organic matter-organism-water-air interfaces at a molecular level to the globe. Soil is the central organizer in the CZ. The rhizosphere is a hot spot of activity within soils. The rhizosphere is the ‘bottle neck” of the supply of vital elements to sustain ecosystem productivity and integrity and food security. The rhizosphere is also the “bottle neck’ of the contamination of the terrestrial food chain by inorganic and organic pollutants to endanger human and animal health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de la ciencia del suelo y nutrición vegetal→Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics→French-language works237,207→