Global Network Reorganization During Dynamic Adaptations of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> Metabolism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Outside In Acquisition and analysis of large data sets promises to move us toward a greater understanding of the mechanisms by which biological systems are dynamically regulated to respond to external cues. Now, two papers explore the responses of a bacterium to changing nutritional conditions (see the Perspective by Chalancon et al. ). Nicolas et al. (p. 1103 ) measured transcriptional regulation for more than 100 different conditions. Greater amounts of antisense RNA were generated than expected and appeared to be produced by alternative RNA polymerase targeting subunits called sigma factors. One transition, from malate to glucose as the primary nutrient, was studied in more detail by Buescher et al. (p. 1099 ) who monitored RNA abundance, promoter activity in live cells, protein abundance, and absolute concentrations of intracellular and extracellular metabolites. In this case, the bacteria responded rapidly and largely without transcriptional changes to life on malate, but only slowly adapted to use glucose, a shift that required changes in nearly half the transcription network. These data offer an initial understanding of why certain regulatory strategies may be favored during evolution of dynamic control systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".