Metamorphic control of magnetic susceptibility and magnetic fabrics: a 3-D projection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Magnetic fabric changes due to progressive metamorphism are poorly understood. Bulk magnetic susceptibility ( κ ) is known to increase with metamorphic grade but anisotropy changes have been neglected. To combine information on anisotropy with bulk susceptibility, we introduce a projection with three axes: κ , ellipsoidal eccentricity ( P j , the so-called ‘anisotropy degree’, despite the fact that this is quantified ) and ellipsoid symmetry ( T j ) as independent variables. The projection reveals that metamorphic facies can be discriminated successfully in the 3-D projection, with distinct, significant regression surfaces for crustal metamorphic rocks metamorphosed successively in greenschist, amphibolite, and granulite facies. This emphasizes that bulk magnetic susceptibility ( κ ) and its anisotropies (‘magnetic fabric’) evolve in response to metamorphic process, not just strain. Moreover, post-tectonic granitic plutons, upper mantle harzburgites and serpentinized mantle rocks also have characteristic regression surfaces relating κ, P j and T j in the new projection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".