MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084185567 · doi:10.3137/ao.440304

Characterizing local scale snow cover using point measurements during the winter season

2006· article· en· W2084185567 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
N. Neumann, Chris Derksen, Craig D. Smith, B. Goodison

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowTransectEnvironmental sciencePhysical geographySnow fieldScale (ratio)Range (aeronautics)Snow coverHydrology (agriculture)GeologyGeographyMeteorologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Snow cover is spatially heterogeneous at the local scale because of micro climatic, topographic and vegetative effects on snow accumulation, redistribution and ablation ‐ processes which vary between different environments. Automated, fixed point snow depth measurements are the norm at research as well as operational sites, and the ability of these single point measurements to characterize snow depth for the surrounding area is an important issue. In this study, data for three winter seasons (2002–03, 2003–04, 2004–05) from ten Boreal Ecosystem Research and Monitoring Sites (BERMS) in northern Saskatchewan were used to assess the relationships between local scale snow depth variability, ascertained from snow survey transects, and single point measurements made with sonic depth sensors. Analysis of the snow surveys showed a wide range of depths at each site, with increased variability as winter progressed. Single, fixed‐point measures of snow depth did not statistically represent the average snow depth at a site, even for relatively uniform snow covers. Consistent over‐ or under‐representation of the landscape mean allowed the development of a “scaling equation” for each point measurement, improving confidence in the use of these data for modelling and climate variability studies. Where manual snow surveys may not be practical, the use of multiple automated point depth measurements may be adopted, and for the BERMS sites it was found that the minimum number of point measurements required to represent the landscape mean within 25% ranged from 1 to 44, depending on the degree of variability in snow depth associated with the landscape type, and the magnitude of the site mean depth. The relationships between point snow depth measurements and mean areal snow depth are important to consider both when utilising historical point observations for climatological and hydro‐logical analysis, and for decision‐making with regards to snow depth observing networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATMOSPHERE-OCEANSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207