Dark preincubation improves shoot organogenesis from Rhodiola crenulata leaf explants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An efficient in vitro plant regeneration system has been developed using dark preincubated leaf explants of Rhodiola crenulata, a traditional Tibetan medicinal plant. The leaf explants, preincubated in the dark for 5 d, developed an average of 9.1 shoots per explant on a medium containing 15 μM N 6-benzyladenine (BA) and 2.5 μM gibberellic acid (GA3). The biochemical mechanism underlying dark-induced shoot organogenesis was investigated by measuring polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity. Dark preincubation significantly reduced PPO activity in leaf explants during the initial period of shoot organogenesis and reduced browning compared to explants cultured in the light. Up to 88.4 % of the regenerated shoots formed roots and developed into complete plantlets on a medium containing 5 μM indoleacetic acid (IAA) within 25 d. Approximately 82 % of the regenerated plantlets survived transplantation and grew vigorously in the greenhouse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".