MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084193677 · doi:10.1007/s10535-012-0261-5

Dark preincubation improves shoot organogenesis from Rhodiola crenulata leaf explants

2012· article· en· W2084193677 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiologia Plantarum · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMedicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsOrganogenesisExplant cultureShootBiologyGibberellic acidBotanyBrowningPolyphenol oxidaseMurashige and Skoog mediumMicropropagationHorticultureIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient in vitro plant regeneration system has been developed using dark preincubated leaf explants of Rhodiola crenulata, a traditional Tibetan medicinal plant. The leaf explants, preincubated in the dark for 5 d, developed an average of 9.1 shoots per explant on a medium containing 15 μM N 6-benzyladenine (BA) and 2.5 μM gibberellic acid (GA3). The biochemical mechanism underlying dark-induced shoot organogenesis was investigated by measuring polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity. Dark preincubation significantly reduced PPO activity in leaf explants during the initial period of shoot organogenesis and reduced browning compared to explants cultured in the light. Up to 88.4 % of the regenerated shoots formed roots and developed into complete plantlets on a medium containing 5 μM indoleacetic acid (IAA) within 25 d. Approximately 82 % of the regenerated plantlets survived transplantation and grew vigorously in the greenhouse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it