MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084204540 · doi:10.5539/enrr.v5n1p46

Geochemical Characteristics and Quality of Groundwater Around Okemesi Fold Belt, South Western Nigeria

2015· article· en· W2084204540 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Olugbenga Okunlola, Adegoke Afolabi

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment and Natural Resources Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchistAlkalinityGroundwaterGneissWater qualityTurbidityTotal dissolved solidsQuartzGeologyEnvironmental chemistryChemistryGeochemistryMineralogyNuclear chemistryEnvironmental scienceMetamorphic rockEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study involves the determination of the hydrochemical character and quality of springs, shallow and deep wells around the Okemesi fold belt, south western Nigeria. This is with a view to elucidate their nature, type and evaluate portability, and suitability for agricultural and industrial purposes. The Okemesi fold belt is underlain by schistose rocks, mainly mica schist, quartz schist, and quartzite with minor amphibolites and gneisses. The major hydrochemical water type are Na – ( K ) – Cl – ( SO4 ) and Ca – (Mg) – ( Cl ) – SO4 water facies constituting about 52% and 47% respectively. The study showed that almost all of the physico-chemical parameters such as total dissolved solid TDS (18.75 - 790.50 mg/l), electrical conductivity EC (25 - 1054 ?s/cm), pH (5.4 - 7.4), temperature (24.8 - 29.5°C), turbidity (2.2 - 40.5 N.T.U), total hardness (10 - 274 mg/l), total alkalinity (18 - 274 mg/l), dissolved oxygen (1.8 - 7 mg/l), chlorine demand (1.56 - 4.75 mg/l); and bacteriological analysis (5 - 80 MPN) results were within the World Health Organization (WHO) limits recommended for drinking water. However, some groundwater samples have Ni+ and K+ concentrations slightly above the recommended standard. These physico-chemical parameters, especially cations: Ca2+ (1.6 - 72.8 mg/l), Mg2+ (0 - 4.39 mg/l), Na+ (1.63 - 75.0 mg/l), K+ (0 - 108.3 mg/l) , Si (4.0 - 10 mg/l), Cu (0 - 0.391 mg/l), Zn (0 - 0.29 mg/l), Cd (0 - 0 mg/l), Pb (0 - 0 mg/l), Fe (0.1 - 0.1 mg/l), Ni (0 - 0.043 mg/l) and anions such as HCO3 (6.1 - 79.3 mg/l), Cl- (5 - 109 mg/l), SO42- (38 - 76 mg/l), NO32- (0 - 0 mg/l) and PO43- (0.005 - 0.03 mg/l) seem to reflect the chemical nature of the underlying rock units suggesting dissolution, weathering and water – soil / rock interaction processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironment and Natural Resources ResearchSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207