MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084220048 · doi:10.2307/2672525

What Did the Internment of Japanese Americans Mean?

2001· article· en· W2084220048 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Taeko Inagi Hiraishi

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Affairs · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHistoryAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foreword Preface A Note for Students PART ONE: INTRODUCTION The Internment of Japanese Americans From Pearl Harbor to Mass Incarceration: A Brief Narrative Historians and Internment: From Relocation Centers to Concentration Camps PART TWO SOME CURRENT QUESTIONS Why were Japanese Americans interned during World War II? R.Daniels What Caused the Supreme Court to Affirm the Constitutionality of Internment? P.Irons Why did U.S. Officials Intern People of Japanese Ancestry from Central and South America? M.Weglyn How did Some Japanese Americans Resist Internment? G.Y.Okihiro What was the Impact of Internment on Japanese American Families and Communities? V.J. Matsumoto Making Connections Suggestions for Further Reading

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacific AffairsSame topicRace, History, and American SocietyFrench-language works237,207