Effectiveness of three Bt corn events against feeding damage by the true armyworm (<i>Pseudaletia unipuncta</i> Haworth)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 3-yr study (2002-2004) was conducted to evaluate the resistance of three Bt corn events to herbivory damage by the armyworm, Pseudaletia unipuncta (Haworth). Resistance was assessed by damage ratings and fresh mass measurements. Greenhouse studies were run in 2002 and 2004, and a field study was conducted in 2003. Hybrids expressing the Cry1A(b) insecticidal protein, Mon810 and Bt176 events, and their near isolines, as well as the TC1507 event, which expresses the Cry1F protein, were evaluated. Bt hybrids suffered less damage in all 3 yr and had higher fresh masses in 2002 and 2003 than the non-transgenic isolines. In 2002 and 2003, hybrids expressing the Cry1A(b) protein were significantly less damaged than the hybrid expressing Cry1F. In both 2002 and 2004, the Mon810 event suffered less damage than the Bt176 event, despite expressing the same Cry1A(b) protein. Bt corn, especially the Mon810 event may be used as an effective method of preventing P. unipuncta herbivory damage in corn. Key words: True armyworm, Pseudaletia unipuncta, Bt corn, Cry1A(b), Cry1F, epistasis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".