MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084256108 · doi:10.7202/305180ar

De Charlevoix au Saguenay : caractéristiques des familles émigrantes au XIXe siècle

2008· article· fr· W2084256108 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Martine Hamel

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d histoire de l Amérique française · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Face au problème de saturation des terres qui se fait sentir dans Charlevoix au milieu du XIXe siècle, certaines familles vont opter pour l'émigration vers la périphérie. Ce mouvement migratoire va entraîner, dès les années 1830, la création d'une nouvelle région, le Saguenay. Notre étude propose une analyse en profondeur, à partir de Charlevoix, de variables socio-démographiques (âge, lieu de naissance, taille des ménages, nombre de garçons et de filles), et socio-économiques (profession, étendue des terres dans le cas des cultivateurs). Elle a permis d'établir un lien entre la situation des familles et leur propension à émigrer vers le Saguenay. Il est ressorti que ce sont les couples aux prises avec une charge familiale plus importante, et qui par le fait même occupaient de moins grandes superficies de terre par personne, qui ont opté pour l'émigration vers la région de colonisation. Cette migration répondait donc à un besoin, dans un contexte où il devenait de plus en plus difficile d'augmenter son capital foncier et de pourvoir à l'établissement des enfants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d histoire de l Amérique françaiseSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207