Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in the Management of Ovarian Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the cytoreductive efforts, and the high responsiveness to standard carboplatin/pacllitaxel front-line treatment, ovarian cancer (OvCa) remains the most lethal gynaecological malignancy with a 5-yr overall survival of only 25%–30% in advanced stage disease. Among the pharmaceutical options available for treatment of OvCa, much attention has been dedicated to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) (Doxil ® in the US; Caelyx ® in Canada and Europe); this drug has a unique formulation which has entrapped conventional doxorubicin in a bilayer lipidic sphere surrounded by a polyethylene glycol layer, which prolongs the persistence of the drug in the circulation and potentiates its intratumor accumulation. These properties represent the winning resource for this drug in that sustain its very favourable toxicity profile and the safe combination with other drugs. PLD has already been approved for treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients failing first line platinum-based treatment. Moreover, Phase III trials have been completed, which will hopefully will bring PLD to front-line treatment, and in salvage setting in combination with platinum agents. This concise review will focus on the clinical role of PLD in the management of patients with epithelial OvCa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".