MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084285389 · doi:10.1063/1.1947384

Effect of annealing temperature ramp rate on bubble formation in helium-implanted silicon

2005· article· en· W2084285389 on OpenAlex
Todd W. Simpson, I. V. Mitchell

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnealing (glass)FluenceMaterials scienceSiliconHeliumAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Ion implantationBubbleScanning electron microscopeLiquid bubbleIonAtomic physicsChemistryOptoelectronicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have implanted He3 into Si(100) at 1.0MeV ion energy and to fluences ranging between 2×1015 and 2×1016cm−2, followed by annealing at 700°C. Heating ramp rates have been systematically varied over more than two decades (0.3°C∕sto100°C∕s) at each fluence. The retention of He3 is measured through the He3(d,p)He4 nuclear reaction yield. We show that gas retention can be varied by more than an order of magnitude even while the other anneal parameters—anneal temperature and anneal time—are maintained constant. Cross-sectional scanning electron micrographs confirm the presence of planetarylike cavity structures at a depth closely matching that calculated for the damage peak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it