Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A highly flexible optical packet compressor is presented. The compressor is capable of providing various compression ratios using the same hardware. It is composed of three parts: a chirped packet generator, a signal compressor, and a wavelength converter. In the chirped packet generator, the modulator intensity-modulates a series of supercontinuum chirped optical carriers and generates a series of chirped optical packets. The signal compressor compresses the chirped packets. The wavelength converter then transforms the compressed wideband optical packets into single-wavelength signals. We numerically demonstrate that using dispersive devices (chirped Bragg grating array or dispersion compensation fiber), we can compress both the width of pulses and the distance among pulses at the same time. This results in an increase of the bit rate. We also show that during the compression, the optical packet suffers distortion in the time domain, which can be defined as an extinction ratio. The distortion can be minimized by control parameters such as carrier chirping and modulating bandwidth. We present a highly flexible optical packet compressor, which is capable of compressing hundreds of bits packets from low speed (mega- or gigabits per second) to very high speed (up to 40 Gbits/s).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it