MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084303335 · doi:10.1002/bmb.2006.494034052656

Fluorescence analysis of sulfonamide binding to carbonic anhydrase

2006· article· en· W2084303335 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme function and inhibition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsFluorophoreChemistryFluorescenceCarbonic anhydrase IILigand (biochemistry)Carbonic anhydraseFörster resonance energy transferBinding constantFluorescence spectroscopyTryptophanAffinitiesBinding siteBiophysicsEnzymeStereochemistryBiochemistryBiologyReceptorAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A practical laboratory experiment is described that illustrates the application of fluorescence resonance energy transfer to the study of protein-ligand binding. The affinities of wild-type and mutant human carbonic anhydrase II for dansylamide were determined by monitoring the increase in ligand fluorescence that occurs due to energy transfer from tryptophan residues near the enzyme active site. In a subsequent experiment, the binding constant of azetazolamide, a weaker fluorophore but a stronger ligand, is measured by competition with dansylamide. This simple experiment introduces students to the widely used technique of fluorescence spectroscopy and to the determination of protein-ligand binding constants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it