RE: PORT SITE TUMOR RECURRENCES OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMA AFTER VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyCLINICAL UROLOGY: Letters to the Editor1 Aug 2001RE: PORT SITE TUMOR RECURRENCES OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMA AFTER VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY Jaime Landman and Ralph V. Clayman Jaime LandmanJaime Landman More articles by this author and Ralph V. ClaymanRalph V. Clayman More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66015-6AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "RE: PORT SITE TUMOR RECURRENCES OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMA AFTER VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY." The Journal of Urology, 166(2), pp. 629–630 References 1 : Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a five-year experience. Urology1999; 53: 280. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 2 : Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol2000; 164: 1153. Link, Google Scholar 3 : Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with morcellation for renal cell carcinoma: the Saskatoon experience. Urology1998; 52: 23. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 4 : Metastatic renal cell carcinoma after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: long-term follow-up. J Endourol2000; 14: 407. Google Scholar Division of Urology, Washington University Medical Center, 4360 Children’s Place, Box 8242, St. Louis, Missouri 63110© 2001 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited bySong J, Kim E, Mobley J, Vemana G, Tanagho Y, Vetter J, Bhayani S, Russo P, Fugita O, Yang S, Iwamura M and Figenshau R (2014) Port Site Metastasis after Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Harbinger of Future MetastasisJournal of Urology, VOL. 192, NO. 2, (364-368), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2014.MICALI S, CELIA A, BOVE P, DE STEFANI S, SIGHINOLFI M, KAVOUSSI L and BIANCHI G (2018) TUMOR SEEDING IN UROLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPY: AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEYJournal of Urology, VOL. 171, NO. 6 Part 1, (2151-2154), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2004.TSIVIAN A and SIDI A (2018) PORT SITE METASTASES IN UROLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERYJournal of Urology, VOL. 169, NO. 4, (1213-1218), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2003. Volume 166Issue 2August 2001Page: 629-630 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2001 by American Urological Association, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jaime Landman More articles by this author Ralph V. Clayman More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".