Is Performance Time a Prerequisite for the Onset and Intensity of the Occlusion-Reperfusion Arrhythmias in Anaesthetised Rats?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to investigate the onset and the intensity of arrhythmias in anaesthetized rats as a function of time under a standardized experimental condition, which is composed of 30 min occlusion and 60 min reperfusion. Local bred rats (250-350 g) housed in a 12-h light-dark cycle (lights on at 09.00 h, lights off at 21.00 h) were anaesthetized by sodium thiopentone (60 mg kg−1 i.p.) and left anterior descending coronary artery ligation method using 6/0 braided silk ligature was used to induce 30 min occlusion and 60-min reperfusion. Animals were randomly allocated into three groups to exposure to 30-min occlusion at 9.00 h and 60 min reperfusion at 9:30 h (Group I, n = 6); to 30 min occlusion at 15.00 h and 60 min reperfusion at 15:30 h (Group II, n = 6); and to 30 min occlusion at 21.00 h and 60 min reperfusion at 21.30 h (Group III, n = 6). ECG and haemodynamic parameters were recorded throughout the experiments. The onset of ventricular ectopic beats (VEBs), number of VEBs, incidences of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) during the periods of occlusion-reperfusion were analysed. Total VF incidence during occlusion were lower than the VT incidence in all groups. Either VT or VF incidences during reperfusion showed same profiles in all groups but VT incidence was 2-fold higher than VF. Time-dependent application of occlusion-reperfusion induced by coronary artery ligation method in the anaesthetized rats did not result in a variation in the onset and the intensity of arrhythmias. The duration of the experimental ischaemia was the principal factor, which determines the time of onset and intensity of the occlusion-reperfusion arrhythmias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".