MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084331007 · doi:10.1139/o05-141

Psoralen photocrosslinking, a tool to study the chromatin structure of RNA polymerase I - transcribed ribosomal genes

2005· review· en· W2084331007 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Martin Toussaint, Geneviève Levasseur, Maxime Tremblay, Michel Paquette, Antonio Conconi

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChromatinBiologyRibosomal DNARNA polymerase IGeneticsRNA polymerase IIIRibosomal RNANucleosomeChIA-PETRNA polymeraseDNAGeneMolecular biologyRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chromatin structure of RNA polymerase I--transcribed ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is well characterized. In most organisms, i.e., lower eukaryotes, plants, and animals, only a fraction of ribosomal genes are transcriptionally active. At the chromatin level inactive rDNA is assembled into arrays of nucleosomes, whereas transcriptionally active rDNA does not contain canonical nucleosomes. To separate inactive (nucleosomal) and active (non-nucleosomal) rDNA, the technique of psoralen photocrosslinking has been used successfully both in vitro and in vivo. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the structure of rDNA chromatin has been particularly well studied during transcription and during DNA replication. Thus, the yeast rDNA locus has become a good model system to study the interplay of all nuclear DNA processes and chromatin. In this review we focused on the studies of chromatin in ribosomal genes and how these results have helped to address the fundamental question: What is the structure of chromatin in the coding regions of genes?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207