MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084382757 · doi:10.1021/ja0600375

A New Strategy for Preparing Molecular Imaging and Therapy Agents Using Fluorine-Rich (Fluorous) Soluble Supports

2006· article· en· W2084382757 on OpenAlexafffund
Amanda C. Donovan, Jane Forbes, Peter N. Dorff, Paul Schaffer, John W. Babich, John F. Valliant

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsChemistryCombinatorial chemistryLinkerBenzoic acidMolecular imagingSolid phase extractionSubstrate (aquarium)Extraction (chemistry)Organic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A convenient new strategy for producing radiolabeled compounds in high effective specific activity was developed using soluble fluorous supports. The reported methodology involves a fluorous linker group that is released from the substrate of interest upon reaction with radioiodine. The desired product can then be selectively separated from unreacted starting material and reaction byproducts using a simple fluorous solid-phase extraction procedure. The utility of this approach was demonstrated by labeling a series of benzoic acid derivatives which are commonly used to prepare molecular imaging agents. All compounds were produced in high radiochemical yields, purities, and effective specific activities. The strategy was further elaborated in that it was used to prepare a small collection of radiolabeled benzamides as a way of demonstrating the potential utility of this method for creating libraries of molecular imaging agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207