The trade-off to macroptery in the cricket <i>Gryllus firmus:</i> a path analysis in males
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Among the Orthoptera, wing dimorphism, where one morph is long-winged and flight capable while the other is short-winged and flight incapable, is common and believed to be maintained in populations due to trade-offs to flight capability. In males, macropterous individuals call less than micropterous individuals and as a consequence obtain fewer matings. This trade-off is hypothesized to be mediated by the energetic costs of calling. In this paper we report results for a path analysis examining lipid weight and DLM (dorso longitudinal muscle) condition of male Gryllus firmus. We found that as DLM condition changes from a nonfunctional to a functional state, call duration decreases, and as lipid weight increases, call duration increases. The most important linked path was wing morph → DLM condition → call duration. This model is consistent with the prediction that the trade-off between wing morph and call duration is mediated via DLM and lipid stores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".