MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084423904 · doi:10.2118/164129-ms

Laboratory Evaluation of H2S Bioscavenging in Produced Water at 60°C

2013· article· en· W2084423904 on OpenAlexaff
J.B. Harris, A.K. Stepp, T.. Pierce, R.H. Webb, G. E. Jenneman, E. D. Burger

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
FundersConocoPhillips
KeywordsNitrateEnvironmental chemistrySulfateSulfideSulfate-reducing bacteriaMicrobial population biologyChemistryMicroorganismBiomass (ecology)BacteriaEcologyBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nitrate can control biogenic souring by lowering sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) metabolic activity and shifting the microbial community such that nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB) out-compete SRB for nutrients. Nitrate was applied in a laboratory study using a 20-cc packed bed upflow reactor to determine kinetic rate of H2S removal. The objectives of the testing were to (1) enrich for nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing microorganisms derived from produced water and (2) determine the kinetic rate of H2S removal at 60˚C in a synthetic medium with an H2S:nitrate molar ratio of 2, and (3) describe the microbial community involved in nitrate-mediated souring control in this system. Sulfide was measured at the face and at the discharge of the column to determine the sulfide oxidation rate. Residence time in the reactor was varied by changing flow rate but a removal rate of nearly 50% H2S was achieved across the column in one hour residence time. This paper provides a description of the microbial community cultivated at high temperature using 16S rRNA to profile the population dynamics resulting from nitrate treatment. Phospholipid fatty acid analysis was also used for taxonomic evaluation and quantifying physiological changes in the biomass due to nitrate treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE International Symposium on Oilfield ChemistrySame topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalFrench-language works237,207