MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084426392 · doi:10.1063/1.3527085

Causes of efficiency roll-off in phosphorescent organic light emitting devices: Triplet-triplet annihilation versus triplet-polaron quenching

2010· article· en· W2084426392 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphorescenceQuenching (fluorescence)PolaronPhotochemistryElectroluminescenceTriphenylamineIridiumOLEDTriplet stateExcitonOptoelectronicsOrganic semiconductorPhosphorescent organic light-emitting diodeMaterials scienceAnnihilationBiphenylChemistryFluorescencePhysicsMoleculeCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Delayed electroluminescence measurements are used to probe and differentiate between triplet-triplet-annihilation (TTA) and triplet-polaron-quenching (TPQ) processes and their correlation with efficiency roll-off in fac-tris(2-phenylpyridine) iridium-based phosphorescent organic light emitting devices. Investigations on devices employing 4,4′-bis(9-carbazolyl)-1,1′-biphenyl (CBP) and 4,4′,4″-tris(N-carbazolyl) triphenylamine, two widely used host materials, show that the efficiency roll-off is primarily due to TPQ processes. Guest-guest TTA, on the other hand, is found to play no major role, contrary to speculations, especially at low guest concentrations. Evidence of host-host TTA in certain cases, and its possible contribution to exciton quenching in the case of devices with CBP host, is also reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it