Insulin Resistance as a Therapeutic Target for Improved Endothelial Function:Metformin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endothelial dysfunction is a feature of a variety of clinical states of insulin resistance, and increasingly it is recognized that pre-diabetic states of insulin resistance are associated not only with insulin resistance but with increased cardiovascular risk. The metabolic syndrome which typically accompanies insulin resistance brings aberrations in a number of classical cardiovascular risk factors, but it appears that insulin resistance itself represents an additional, non-classical risk factor. Therefore, the approach to treating the endothelium in patients with the metabolic syndrome might include therapies targeting insulin resistance. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the biguanide metformin and its effects on the endothelium. Its mode of action is reviewed, along with the available data from laboratory and experimental studies related to vascular function in animals and in humans. Metformin has beneficial effects on endothelial function which appear to be mediated through its effects to improve insulin resistance. Therapeutically targeting insulin resistance appears to be a viable route to improving endothelial function in clinical states of insulin resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".