Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le contact avec le Canada n’est guère mentionné parmi les expériences qui ont marqué la pensée d’Alexis de Tocqueville. Pourtant, ses écrits sur le Canada offrent un éclairage saisissant de l’évolution de son oeuvre et ce, de deux façons. Premièrement, ils mettent en lumière les oscillations de cet auteur entre son idéal de liberté et son nationalisme. Deuxièmement, ils démontrent que le voyage au Bas-Canada a influencé la représentation que Tocqueville s’est faite de la société d’Ancien régime. Ses études canadiennes permettent ainsi de mieux comprendre les deux axes normatifs qui traversent son oeuvre et en font la richesse, soit la polarisation entre le libéralisme et le nationalisme, et entre la démocratie et l’aristocratie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it