Rat oligodendrocytes express the vitamin D3 receptor and respond to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study investigates the presence of vitamin D receptor (VDR) in cells of the rat oligodendrocyte (OL) lineage. VDR transcripts were detected by in situ hybridization in a fraction of rat OL in secondary cultures. The VDR protein was shown to be co-localized in cells that are also recognized by an anti-myelin basic protein (MBP) antibody. Likewise, in vivo, VDR-positive cells were found in the brain white matter, such as the internal capsule of the striatum or the corpus callosum but also in the spinal cord. At least part of these positive cells in vivo correspond to OL, since they were co-stained by an anti-carbonic anhydrase II antiserum. Northern blot analyses of the CG-4 OL cell line demonstrated that the VDR transcripts are already found in the O-2A precursors. There was a two-fold increase in the relative abundance of these transcripts in differentiated OL or in type-2 astrocytes. 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1,25-(OH)(2)D(3)] increased the pool of transcripts encoding its own receptor, the VDR. The hormone also enhanced the abundance of the mRNA of the nerve growth factor (NGF) and of its low-affinity receptor, the p75(NTR) protein. By contrast, the hormone had no effect on the levels of MBP or proteolipid protein (PLP) mRNA. This finding suggests that unlike retinoic acid (RA) or thyroid hormone, 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) has no regulatory action on the synthesis of myelin proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".