MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084474840 · doi:10.1021/es010504c

An Improved Thermal Oxidation Method for the Quantification of Soot/Graphitic Black Carbon in Sediments and Soils

2001· article· en· W2084474840 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yves Gélinas, Kenneth M. Prentice, Jeff Baldock, John I. Hedges

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEnvironmental chemistrySootChemistryTotal organic carbonCarbon blackBiogeochemical cycleOrganic matterCharcoalCarbon fibersMineralogyCombustionOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent findings have confirmed the importance of black carbon (BC) in the global biogeochemical cycles of carbon and oxygen through its important contribution to the slowly cycling organic carbon (OC) pool. Yet, most BC determination methods published to date measure operationally defined BC fractions, oftentimes with a high potential for artifacts and a lack of specificity for one of the two major forms of the BC continuum, soot/graphitic BC (GBC) and char/charcoal BC (CBC). This paper describes a method that reduces the potential for artifacts to accurately and selectively measure the concentration of GBC in complex mineral and organic matrixes. Marine and lacustrine sediments, river sediments, suspended particles, and a marine plankton sample were first demineralized with a mixture of hydrochloric (HCl) and hydrofluoric (HF) acids to expose any biochemical entrapped in a mineral matrix. The hydrolyzable organic matter fraction (mostly proteins and carbohydrates) was then removed with 02-free trifluoroacetic acid and HCl, after which the non-GBC, non-hydrolyzable OC fraction was finally removed by thermal oxidation at 375 degrees C for 24 h. The specificity of the method for GBC was assessed with pure CBC and GBC samples. Detection limit and GBC recovery in spiked samples were 10 mg kg(-1) and approximately 85%, respectively. Typical GBC concentrations measured in a series of natural samples ranged from <10 mg kg(-1) in marine plankton to 0.19% in a riverine sample. These concentrations were lower by as much as 3 orders of magnitude than those obtained by thermal oxidation without demineralization and removal of hydrolyzable organic matter. The improvements presented in this work allow for the accurate and precise measurement of GBC in complex organic and mineral matrixes by eliminating the interference caused by the presence of CBC, residual non-BC OC and minerals, or by the formation of condensation products that could account for as much as 4-6% of total OC. Combined to stable and radioisotope analysis, this improved method should permit quantitative assessments of the role and dynamics of GBC in the global geochemical cycles of carbon and oxygen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations255
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207