A novel rabbit model of variably compensated complete heart block
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Complete heart block (CHB) provides a useful substrate for study of bradycardia-dependent ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac function. Existing CHB animal models are limited by surgical recovery time and reliance on intrinsic escape rhythms. We describe a novel closed-chest rabbit model of CHB involving transcatheter radiofrequency (RF) atrioventricular (AV) node ablation and ventricular rate control with chronic transvenous pacing. Permanent CHB was achieved in 34 of 38 attempts overall. Procedural mortality due to cardiac tamponade (n = 2), airway complications (n = 2), and unknown causes (n = 5) occurred in nine animals. Survivors with CHB (n = 28) were maintained for < or = 22 days, during which there were three late deaths related to infection (n = 1) or respiratory distress (n = 2). None of the survivors with CHB showed recovery of AV conduction or pacemaker capture loss during chronic ventricular pacing at about one-half normal sinus rates, and 25 animals surviving to death showed no overt signs of hemodynamic compromise such as lethargy, poor feeding, or respiratory distress. This approach provides a reproducible nonsurgical CHB model with adjustable ventricular rate control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".