Intracellular lipid droplet targeting by apolipoprotein A-V requires the carboxyl-terminal segment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The expression of apolipoprotein A-V (apoA-V) in hepatoma cells results in homing of this protein to intracellular lipid droplets. When hepatoma cells transfected with a full-length apoA-V-green fluorescent protein fusion protein were cultured in medium that was not supplemented with oleic acid (OA), intracellular lipid droplet size and number were reduced compared with those of cells supplemented with OA. Confocal microscopy studies revealed that apoA-V associates with lipid droplets under both conditions. To define the structural requirements for apoA-V lipid droplet association, hepatoma cells were transfected with a series of C-terminal truncated apoA-V variants. Confocal microscopy analysis revealed that, in a manner similar to mature full-length apoA-V (343 amino acids), truncation variants apoA-V(1-292), apoA-V(1-237), and apoA-V(1-191) associated with lipid droplets, while apoA-V(1-146) did not. Western blot analysis of the relative abundance of apoA-V in cell lysates versus conditioned medium indicated that apoA-V variants associated with lipid droplets were poorly secreted while apoA-V(1-146) was efficiently secreted. Ultracentrifugation of conditioned medium revealed that, unlike full-length apoA-V, which associates with lipoproteins, apoA-V(1-146) was present solely in the lipoprotein-deficient fraction. Deletion of the N-terminal signal peptide from apoA-V resulted in an inability of the protein to be secreted into the medium, although it associated with lipid droplets. Taken together, these data suggest that the C terminus of apoA-V is essential for lipid droplet association in transfected hepatoma cells and lipoprotein association in conditioned medium while the signal peptide is required for extracellular trafficking of this protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".