Spatiotemporal dynamics of reentrant ventricular tachycardias in canine myocardial infarction: pharmacological modulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the transition from a slow to rapid depolarization rhythm, rate-dependent sodium channel blockade develops progressively and increases from beat to beat under procainamide but more abruptly under lidocaine. We investigated the consequences of such differences on the dynamic course and stability of reentrant tachycardias at their onset. Procainamide and lidocaine were infused to equipotent plasma concentrations in canines with three-day-old myocardial infarction. We measured the activation times (ms) and maximum slopes of negative deflections in activation complexes (absolute value: /-dV/dt(max)/ in mV/ms) in 191 unipolar electrograms recorded from ischemically damaged subepicardial muscle during programmed stimulation inducing reentrant tachycardias. Procainamide caused a greater reduction in /-dV/dt(max)/ than did lidocaine in the responses to basic stimulation, and it favored the occurrence of cycle length prolongation at tachycardia onset as the /-dV/dt(max)/ decreased progressively in successive beats. This resulted in conduction block and tachycardia termination in three of eight preparations. In contrast, lidocaine caused a greater depression in /-dV/dt(max)/ in response to closely coupled extrastimuli, but /-dV/dt(max)/ remained constant or even improved thereafter, and none of the tachycardias terminated spontaneously under lidocaine (n = 9). However, the reentrant circuits remained spatially unstable, and lidocaine favored the occurrence of cycle length dynamics displaying constant or decreasing trends. This study supports the notion that cycle length dynamics at tachycardia onset are determined by the properties of the reentrant substrate and their pharmacological modulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".