MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084564405 · doi:10.1139/s08-023

Investigation on the use of nitrified wastewater for the steady-state operation of a biotrickling filter for the removal of hydrogen sulphide in biogas

2008· article· en· W2084564405 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Gabriela Soreanu, Michel Béland, Patricia Falletta, Kara Edmonson, Peter Seto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicOdor and Emission Control Technologies
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNatural Resources CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaScience and Technology Directorate
KeywordsBiogasWastewaterNitratePulp and paper industryDenitrificationEnvironmental scienceChemistryAnoxic watersBioreactorEnvironmental engineeringWaste managementEnvironmental chemistryNitrogenEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A biological process for the removal of hydrogen sulphide (H2S) in digester biogas was investigated using nitrified municipal wastewater as a nutrient solution under anoxic conditions. Biogas was continuously fed into a 0.012 m3 biotrickling filter at an H2S loading rate of approximately 1.50 g/d, counter-current to the nutrient solution. A zero-order macro-kinetic process was established on the basis of the degradation and formation rates for N and S species. The process performance was dependent on the presence of nitrate at low concentrations (in the order of 20 mg N-NO3–/L) found to be sufficient to maintain maximum H2S removal efficiency (>99%) under steady-state conditions where nitrate degradation rate was constant. The developed process has the potential to be adopted as an attractive alternative for biogas cleaning and, in some cases, with simultaneous wastewater denitrification. The information contained within this paper may be used as a basis for further research and (or) in the design of a scaled-up process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicOdor and Emission Control TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207