MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084565322 · doi:10.1109/pes.2007.386186

A Perspective on WAMS Analysis Tools for Tracking of Oscillatory Dynamics

2007· article· en· W2084565322 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J.F. Hauer, Daniel Trudnowski, J.G. DeSteese

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBonneville Power AdministrationBC Hydro
KeywordsPhasorPerspective (graphical)Computer scienceElectric power systemSystem of measurementTracking (education)ArchitectureSystem dynamicsPower (physics)Control engineeringSystems engineeringReal-time computingEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over roughly the past two decades, an architecture has evolved for using wide area measurement systems to monitor power-system oscillatory dynamics. This includes, but is not limited to, the use of phasor measurement units and advanced signal processing algorithms. Today, this architecture is further evolving toward real-time operation applications. This paper provides a perspective upon these analysis approaches, and defines and clarifies analysis operations, interactions, and application conditions. An overview of WAMS analysis approaches is given along with several examples from the western North American power system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations145
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Engineering Society General MeetingSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207