Hormonal Manipulation of Benign Metastasizing Leiomyomas: Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Benign metastasizing leiomyomas (BMLs) occur predominantly in women during reproductive years. The condition is characterized by uterine leiomyomas associated with the development, typically years later, of slow-growing metastatic lesions. The most commonly affected organs are the lungs, but BMLs have been reported in lymph nodes, deep soft tissues, mesentery, bones, the central nervous system, and the heart. In many cases, these lesions have an indolent course and are discovered rather incidentally. However, occasionally they can present with debilitating symptoms or even life-threatening complications. The presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors in these tumors supports their origin from uterine smooth muscle and, more importantly, makes them amenable to hormonal manipulation. Radical interventions, such as extensive tumor debulking and oophorectomy for hormonal control, although effective in many cases, are not always possible or desirable and carry significant morbidity. Here we present two cases of BMLs to illustrate the role of newer therapeutic agents, the estrogen receptor modulators and the aromatase inhibitors, in the hormonal manipulation of these tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it