MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084588029 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2001-024-5

Spaces of Lorentz Multipliers

2001· article· en· W2084588029 on OpenAlexaff
Kathryn E. Hare, Enji Sato

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Harmonic Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLorentz transformationMultiplier (economics)Dirichlet distributionLorentz spaceSpace (punctuation)Pure mathematicsCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We study when the spaces of Lorentz multipliers from L p,t → L p,s are distinct. Our main interest is the case when s < t, the Lorentz-improving multipliers. We prove, for example, that the space of multipliers which map L p,t → L p,s is different from those mapping L p,t → L p,s if either r = p or p′ and 1/ s − 1/ t ≠ 1/ u − 1/ v , or r ≠ p or p′. These results are obtained by making careful estimates of the Lorentz multiplier norms of certain linear combinations of Fejer or Dirichlet kernels. For the case when the first indices are different the linear combination we analyze is in the spirit of a Rudin-Shapiro polynomial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Harmonic Analysis ResearchFrench-language works237,207