MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084589549 · doi:10.1063/1.4808113

Miscible density-unstable displacement flows in inclined tube

2013· article· en· W2084589549 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminar flowPhysicsMechanicsFroude numberReynolds numberBuoyancyDimensionless quantityDisplacement (psychology)Stratified flowStratified flowsNewtonian fluidFlow (mathematics)ViscosityInstabilityThermodynamicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the displacement flow of two Newtonian fluids in an inclined pipe. The fluids have the same viscosity but different densities. The displacing fluid is denser than the displaced fluid and is placed above the displaced fluid (i.e., a density-unstable configuration). Three dimensionless groups describe these flows: a densimetric Froude number Fr, a Reynolds number Re, and the pipe inclination β. Our experiments cover fairly broad ranges of these parameters: 0 ⩽ Fr ⩽ 9; 0 ⩽ Re ⪅ 2400; 0 ⩽ β ⩽ 85°. Phenomenologically, our experimental flow observations vary from well mixed fully diffusive regimes, through buoyancy-dominated inertial exchange regimes, to laminar viscous flows, all with varying degrees of stability. We characterize the different flow regimes observed in terms of the three dimensionless groups and provide leading order approximations to the velocity of the displacement front and the macroscopic diffusion in each regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it