MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084609713 · doi:10.1190/1.1839728

Seismic attribute analysis in hydrothermal dolomite, devonian slave point formation, Northeast British Columbia, Canada

2004· article· en· W2084609713 on OpenAlex
Uwe Strecker, Maggie Smith, Richard Uden, Matthew B. Carr, Gareth Taylor, Steve Knapp

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDolomiteGeologyDevonianHydrothermal circulationPoint (geometry)PaleontologyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances in visualization technology and seismic attribute analysis are beginning to revolutionize the landscape of 3‐D seismic interpretation. This presentation focuses on the interpretive use of post‐stack seismic attributes for seismic reservoir characterization. Multiple seismic attributes facilitate structural interpretation and recognition of seismic stratigraphy, but as importantly, they may offer clues to lithology typing and estimation of fluid content from seismic data. Potential benefits include reduction of stratigraphic and structural drilling risks, seismic reservoir characterization in exploration settings, and value increase of new and vintage 3D seismic data. Immediate improvements in drilling risk reduction can be obtained by using multiple seismic attributes. This enhancement occurs because each seismic attribute computation resembles a non‐linear filter that decomposes reflection data into its constituents, and, as a consequence, use of multiple seismic attributes restores much of the discriminating information retained in the originally recorded wavefield (Barnes, 2001; Taner, 2001). Thus, each seismic attribute, for instance, amplitude, inadvertently contains only a subset of the total information recorded, since a single seismic attribute represents only one numerical property of a propagating seismic wavefield. In this presentation, we advocate the use of geometric attributes in conjunction with relative acoustic impedance and frequency‐derived seismic attributes. In the past, use of geometric attributes was mostly limited to edge detection, where edges in the seismic data commonly represent faults or stratigraphic terminations (seismic facies changes). In this Devonian Slave Point Formation case study, we use post‐stack seismic attributes to • Determine the azimuths of conjugate fracture trends in the subsurface • Identify “leaky” vs. sealing fault segments and possible migration/charge/escape pathways. • Identify “sweet spots” in the subsurface Blind testing helped confirm validity of interpretational approach in identifying porous dolostone facies and has resulted in ranking of future prospect locations. 3‐D seismic examples are from northeast British Columbia, Canada (Bubbles Survey) and were provided by Olympic Seismic. Results from this case study should find application in seismic exploration for fractured and hydrothermally altered carbonates worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207