Nonuniqueness of magnetic fields and energy derivatives in spin-polarized density functional theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of the recently uncovered nonuniqueness of the external magnetic field B(r) corresponding to a given pair of density n(r) and spin density n(s)(r) on the derivative of the energy functional of spin-polarized density functional theory, and its implications for the definition of chemical reactivity descriptors, is examined. For ground states, the nonuniqueness of B(r) implies the nondifferentiability of the energy functional E(v,B)[n,n(s)] with respect to n(s)(r). It is shown, on the other hand, that this nonuniqueness allows the existence of the one-sided derivatives of E(v,B)[n,n(s)] with respect to n(s)(r). Although the N-electron ground state can always be obtained from the minimization of E(v,B)[n,n(s)] without any constraint on the spin number N(s)=integraln(s)(r)dr, the Lagrange multiplier mu(s) associated with the fixation of N(s) does not vanish even for ground states. Mu(s) is identified as the left- or right-side derivative of the total energy with respect to N(s), which justifies the interpretation of mu(s) as a (spin) chemical potential. This is relevant not only for the spin-polarized generalization of conceptual density functional theory, the spin chemical potential being one of the elementary reactivity descriptors, but also for the extension of the thermodynamical analogy of density functional theory for the spin-polarized case. For higher-order reactivity indices, B(r)'s nonuniqueness has similar implications as for mu(s), leading to a split of the indices with respect to N(s) into one-sided reactivity descriptors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".