Heat-Transfer Analogy for Wax Deposition from Paraffinic Mixtures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wax deposition from mixtures of a paraffinic wax (C 20 −C 40 ) dissolved in n -dodecane (C 12 ) was investigated. A novel batch apparatus was developed, in which the flow of a “hot” wax−C 12 mixture was accomplished with an axial flow propeller while the solid deposition took place on the inner “cold” surface of a draft tube. The effects of mixture composition, shear rate, residence time, and temperature on solid deposition were studied at pseudo-steady state. Predictions from a steady-state heat-transfer model were in good agreement with experimental data, which confirmed the wax deposition process to be controlled primarily by heat transfer. A temperature difference ratio corresponding to the fractional temperature difference across the deposit layer was related to the amount of deposited solids. GC analyses of the deposited solids were used to study compositional changes within the liquid and solid phases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it