Experimental and Theoretical Electron Density Study of a Highly Twisted Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon: 4-Methyl-[4]helicene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Helicenes are molecules of considerable interest in view of their aromaticity which persists despite a marked departure from planarity and because of the extreme potency of some of their metabolites as tumor and mutation promoters. In this study, the electron density of 4-methyl-[4]helicene (or 4-methylbenzo[c]phenanthrene) is studied topologically with an emphasis on the fjord region since this region is where metabolic activation is initiated. The molecule consists of four fused aromatic rings that assume a twisted geometry. This geometry brings two hydrogen atoms into close proximity in the fjord region of the molecule accompanied by the appearance of an intramolecular C-Hdelta+...delta+H-C bond path (an interaction termed hydrogen-hydrogen or H- H bonding to distinguish it from dihydrogen bonding from which it is qualitatively distinct). In addition to the intramolecular H-H interaction, a number of intermolecular interactions are shown to be involved in the packing of this molecule in the crystalline state. The effect of the nonplanarity of the molecule on the local aromaticity of each ring is also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".