Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In data-mining applications, it is common to transform (or map) nominal attributes into numeric ones in order to apply a specific model. However, a nominal attribute has typically no specific order in its values and no geometric meaning. An interesting issue is, does such a transformation change the property of a nominal function? How do you measure the geometric complexity of a nominal function independent of the mapping? This paper discusses the issue of converting a nominal function into a numeric one. We propose a three-layer measure for the geometric linearity of a nominal function and explore the geometric property of a nominal function independent of the mapping. Naive Bayes is one of the most efficient and effective inductive-learning algorithms for data mining. It is well known that Naive Bayes is linear in the binary domain; that is, it can learn only linearly separable functions. We show that Naive Bayes is actually nonlinear in the nominal domain, a general case of the binary domain, by exploring the geometric property of Naive Bayes. We investigate the geometric property of Naive Bayes based on the three-layer linearity measure that we propose. Our work helps researchers to understand the influence of numeric mapping on the property of a nominal function, and how numeric mapping affects the learnability of Naive Bayes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it