Modelling of Gas‐Liquid/Gas‐Liquid‐Solid Flows in Bubble Columns: Experiments and CFD Simulations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Gas‐liquid/gas‐liquid‐solid systems are widely used in the chemical process industry for a variety of applications. In the present work, we have characterized the dynamics of gas‐liquid/gas‐liquid‐solid flows in cylindrical bubble columns using experiments and CFD simulations. The low frequency oscillations corresponding to the local re‐circulatory flow were characterized using wall pressure fluctuation measurements. Eulerian‐Eulerian two‐/three‐phase simulations were carried out with a focus on characterizing the dynamic properties of gas‐liquid/gas‐liquid‐solid flows. The effects of superficial gas velocity,H/Dratio and solid loading on the dynamic and time‐averaged flow behavior were studied experimentally and computationally. The simulated results were compared with the experimental measurements. The results presented are useful for understanding the dynamics of gas‐liquid/gas‐liquid‐solid flows in bubble columns and provide a basis for further development of CFD models for three‐phase systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".