Immediate Plate Osteosynthesis of Open Fractures of the Humeral Shaft
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of immediate plate osteosynthesis in the surgical treatment of open humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: In a Level I trauma center and teaching hospital, we reviewed 53 patients with open humeral diaphyseal fractures who were treated with immediate open reduction and plate fixation from April 1988 to August 1998. Forty-six patients were available for adequate follow-up and assessment. All fractures were treated with a standard protocol that included irrigation and debridement, intravenous antibiotics, and immediate open reduction and plate fixation. Patients were assessed to determine whether bone grafts were needed during surgery, whether bone union was achieved, the state of the radial nerve, and postoperative complications. No quantitative functional outcomes were assessed, because this was beyond the scope of the study. It was hypothesized that immediate plate osteosynthesis would achieve safe and acceptable clinical results. RESULTS: The 46 patients with adequate final follow-up were assessed at a mean time of 37.5 weeks (13-156 weeks). All fractures united primarily in satisfactory angulation <5 degrees in coronal and sagittal planes. There were 6 delayed unions with a mean time to union of 42.5 weeks (30-72 weeks). The remaining 40 patients united at a mean of 18.4 weeks (12-26 weeks). No patient required subsequent surgery to obtain union of the fracture. Complications were rare, with no deep infections, nonunions, or iatrogenic nerve injuries. Complications included amputation in three patients and dysesthesia in one patient. Two patients had implants removed because of discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate plate osteosynthesis for open humeral shaft fractures has been shown to produce excellent results regarding bone union and absence of deep infections and is a safe technique in the management of these injuries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".