Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein-based radicals generated in the reaction of ferricytochrome c (cyt c) with H(2)O(2) were investigated by electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) using 3,5-dibromo-4-nitrosobenzenesulfonate (DBNBS). Up to four DBNBS-cyt c adducts were observed in the mass spectra. However, by varying the reaction conditions (0-5 molar equivalents of H(2)O(2) and substituting cyt c with its cyanide adduct which is resistant to peroxidation), noncovalent DBNBS adduct formation was inferred. Nonetheless, optical difference spectra revealed the presence of a small fraction of covalently trapped DBNBS. To probe the nature of the noncovalent DBNBS adducts, the less basic proteins, metmyoglobin (Mb) and alpha-lactalbumin, were substituted for cyt c in the cyt c/H(2)O(2)/DBNBS reaction. A maximum of two DBNBS adducts were observed in the mass spectra of the products of the Mb/H(2)O(2)/DBNBS reactions, whereas no adducts were detected following alpha-lactalbumin/H(2)O(2)/DBNBS incubation, which is consistent with adduct formation via spin trapping only. Titration with DBNBS at pH 2.0 yielded noncovalent DBNBS-cyt c adducts and induced folding of acid-denatured cyt c, as monitored by ESI-MS and optical spectroscopy, respectively. Thus, the noncovalent DBNBS-cyt c mass adducts observed are assigned to ion pair formation occurring between the negatively charged sulfonate group on DBNBS and positively charged surface residues on cyt c. The results reveal the pitfalls inherent in using mass spectral data with negatively charged spin traps such as DBNBS to identify sites of radical formation on basic proteins such as cyt c.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".