MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084753331 · doi:10.1115/fedsm2007-37596

The Impact of Surface Contamination on the Flow Beneath Wind-Generated Waves

2007· article· en· W2084753331 on OpenAlexaff
Kamran Siddiqui, Mark Loewen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle image velocimetryContaminationVelocimetryParticle (ecology)Surface waterGeologyParticle tracking velocimetryFlow velocityFlow (mathematics)Surface (topology)Environmental scienceMaterials scienceMechanicsTurbulencePhysicsEnvironmental engineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on an experimental study conducted to investigate flow characteristics in the near-surface layer beneath clean and surfactant-contaminated water surfaces in the presence of wind. The two-dimensional velocity field beneath the water surface was measured using particle image velocimetry. The water surface temperature measurements were made simultaneously using infrared imagery. The results show the existence of the viscous sublayer beneath both clean and contaminated water surfaces. Within the viscous sublayer in contaminated water, the mean streamwise velocity is 25–30% larger and the mean streamwise velocity gradients are more than a factor of two larger compared to that beneath clean water surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207