MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084768900 · doi:10.1063/1.4771679

A detailed characterization of the transient electron transport within zinc oxide, gallium nitride, and gallium arsenide

2012· article· en· W2084768900 on OpenAlexaff
Walid A. Hadi, Shamsul Azam Chowdhury, M. S. Shur, Stephen K. O’Leary

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsWurtzite crystal structureGallium nitrideGallium arsenideWide-bandgap semiconductorMaterials scienceElectric fieldZincGalliumOptoelectronicsNitrideCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A three-valley Monte Carlo simulation approach is used in order to probe the transient electron transport that occurs within bulk wurtzite zinc oxide, bulk wurtzite gallium nitride, and bulk zinc-blende gallium arsenide. For the purposes of this analysis, we follow the approach of O'Leary et al. [O'Leary et al., Solid State Commun. 150, 2182 (2010)], and study how electrons, initially in thermal equilibrium, respond to the sudden application of a constant applied electric field. Through a determination of the dependence of the transient electron drift velocity on both the time elapsed since the onset of the applied electric field and the applied electric field strength, a complete characterization of the transient electron transport response of these materials is obtained. We then apply these results in order to estimate how the optimal cut-off frequency and the corresponding operating device voltage vary with the device length. We find that while the cut-off frequency found for the case of zinc-blende gallium arsenide, 637 GHz for a device length of 100 nm, is marginally less than that found for the cases of wurtzite zinc oxide and wurtzite gallium nitride, 1.05 and 1.32 THz, respectively, the corresponding operating voltage found for the case of zinc-blende GaAs, 0.08 V, precludes the use of this material for the operation of devices in the terahertz frequency range if higher powers are required; the corresponding operating voltages for the cases of wurtzite ZnO and wurtzite GaN are found to be 8 and 4 V, respectively. These results clearly demonstrate the compelling advantage offered by wurtzite zinc oxide and wurtzite gallium nitride, as opposed to zinc-blende gallium arsenide, for electron devices operating in the terahertz frequency range if higher powers are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicZnO doping and propertiesFrench-language works237,207