MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084773532 · doi:10.1093/ndtplus/sfn009

Implementation of high-throughput screening for Fabry disease in Toronto dialysis patients

2008· article· en· W2084773532 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vanessa I. Rasaiah, James Underwood, Dimitrios G. Oreopoulos, Jeffrey A. Medin

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Kidney Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Western HospitalUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineFabry diseaseDialysisThroughputHigh-throughput screeningIntensive care medicineInternal medicineDiseaseBioinformaticsComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir, Fabry disease is a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by mutations in the α-galactosidase A (α-gal A) gene. Affected hemizygous males have impaired or abrogated activity of α-gal A enzyme that leads to a buildup of neutral glycosphingolipids, particularly globotriaosylceramide (Gb3), in many tissues and organs [1]. Symptoms include acroparesthesias, angiokeratomas, corneal opacities, and cardiovascular and renal complications, with death usually occurring by the fifth decade of life [1]. Females that are heterozygous carriers of an α-gal A enzyme mutation show a wide variety in the range and severity of their symptoms. The kidney is of particular pathological importance in Fabry disease, as kidney failure due to Gb3 buildup is a major complication; along with cardiac failure it is a leading cause of death [2]. In recent years, it has been proposed that some dialysis patients could be suffering from undiagnosed Fabry disease and therefore there would be benefits to screening dialysis patients for this disease [3,4]. We carried out a pilot screening study at the Toronto General Hospital in Ontario, Canada, to implement our previously published high-throughput blood spot assay for Fabry disease [5]. Informed consent was obtained from 147 forthcoming. dialysis patients to screen their blood for levels of α-gal A enzyme. Based on our blood spot assay, 141 of these patients had whole blood α-gal A enzyme activity levels within the normal range compared to normal and Fabry controls [5, and unpublished data]. For those six patients with activity below 1.5 nmol/h/ml (<65% of average enzyme activity in normal controls), secondary plasma α-gal A enzyme assays showed that all patients were within the normal range. While no Fabry patients were identified in the relatively small participating patient population, this study shows application of our previously published high-throughput screening method. Our assay is a rapid and low-cost method for screening patients that may be suffering from undiagnosed Fabry disease. This initial screening study did not exclude any patients willing to participate, so both males and females were included. As with other symptoms, α-gal A enzyme levels in female Fabry patients vary with the individual and can even approach normal levels. We thus cannot discount the possibility that there remain undiagnosed female Fabry patients in this population. For this male dialysis population. With the availability of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for lysosomal storage disorders such as Fabry disease, standardized screening for particular biomarkers is beginning to be considered a useful tool for diagnostics [6]. Future screening studies may help to identify Fabry patients that would gain immediate benefit from diagnosis. Screening for this disease is particularly timely in Canada, where a comparative clinical trial of currently approved ERT drugs is ongoing. We would like to thank the patients and the staff at the UHN dialysis clinic for their participation in this study, and Armando Poeppl for technical assistance. This study was sponsored in part by an NIH grant to JAM (HL0569); sample collection and analyses were supported by Genzyme Canada Inc.; Genzyme had no role in the interpretation of results and had no access to individual patient data. Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Kidney JournalSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207