MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Closing of a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit: A Manifestation of Lost Values

2009· article· en· W2084824207 on OpenAlexaffabout
Phyllis Montgomery, Barbara Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives In Psychiatric Care · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensive care unitPsychiatryClosing (real estate)Unit (ring theory)Intensive careMedicineValue (mathematics)PsychologyNursingIntensive care medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TOPIC: A psychiatric intensive care unit shown to be of value to patients and staff was closed within a year, ostensibly for economic reasons. PURPOSE: To examine the usefulness of psychiatric intensive care units, and the importance of thinking through the ramifications of downsizing SOURCE: A case study of a psychiatric ICU in Northern Ontario, Canada and a review of the literature. CONCLUSIONS: When downsizing is considered, a careful examination of values must take place, remembering patient care comes first.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives In Psychiatric CareSame topicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207