Methods of Logistic Infrastructure Formation for Enterprises Manufacturing Bottled Water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The modern post-industrial level of development of social-economic relations implies the primacy of services,intensification of scientific-technical progress, as well as the integration of economic operators, including in thesphere of production. Functioning of the industrial enterprises is impossible without a developed logisticsinfrastructure, the formation of which is connected with the adoption of managerial decisions on the compositionof its elements and their geographic location. Decision-making process on the composition and quantity ofinfrastructure objects should be based on the mathematical modeling. In today's economy, it is vitally importantto the formation of the logistics infrastructure of enterprises, oriented to meet the demand of end users. Inparticular, this area is the production of bottled drinking water, which is relatively new for Russia. The bottleddrinking water market is one of the fastest-growing in Russia, and water is a world strategic resource. Tooptimize the process of formation of the logistics infrastructure of enterprises for the production of bottleddrinking water is possible by application of the principles of logistics. The above determines the importance ofthe topic of the issue, its theoretical orientation and practical significance. Multivariate analysis is a tool thatreveals the relationship between a number of external and internal factors and the composition of objectslogistics infrastructure. Based on these factors through multivariate regression analysis were constructedmathematical model for determining the composition of the elements of the logistics infrastructure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".