MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084833305 · doi:10.1007/s100240010142

Menkes Disease after Copper Histidine Replacement Therapy: Case Report

2001· article· en· W2084833305 on OpenAlexaff
David H. George, Robin Casey

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsRoyal University Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenkes diseasePathologyPathologicalConnective tissueCentral nervous systemMedicineCopper deficiencyBiologyCopper metabolismCopperInternal medicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Menkes disease (MD) is an X-linked recessive disorder of copper metabolism, characterized in its untreated state by progressive disorders of multiple systems, especially the central nervous system (CNS) and connective tissue, and death by 3 years of age. Recently, therapy with copper-histidine has modified the severity of MD and permitted survival into adolescence. Clinical response has been greater for the neurological abnormalities than for the connective tissue abnormalities. In this report, we describe the postmortem pathology of one individual who had received copper-histidine therapy and died at age 10; we believe this to be the first such pathological report. The postmortem examination demonstrated significant pathology of mesenchymal tissues, including skeletal abnormalities, vascular degeneration, and bladder diverticula. The CNS, by contrast, showed minimal pathology. The phenotype was more consistent with occipital horn syndrome, a milder allelic disorder of copper metabolism, than with classic MD. The differential sensitivity of CNS and mesenchymal tissues to copper-histidine therapy may result from heterogeneity in the response of different copper-dependent enzymes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207