MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084881537 · doi:10.1080/0036554021000028098

Auditory-evoked Potential Studies of Cortical Maturation in Normal Hearing and Implanted Children: Correlations with Changes in Structure and Speech Perception

2003· review· en· W2084881537 on OpenAlexaff
Jos J. Eggermont, Curtis W. Ponton

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Oto-Laryngologica · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuditory cortexAudiologySpeech perceptionPerceptionPsychologyNeuroscienceCochlear implantAuditory systemPeriod (music)Auditory pathwaysCochlear nucleusAuditory perceptionMedicineBrainstemAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human auditory system maturation as assessed by means of auditory-evoked potential recording is compared to maturation of axon neurofilaments and some critical stages in speech perception. The parallels strongly suggest that the emergence of the N1 component reflects the maturation of the axons in layer II and upper layer III of the auditory cortex. This is also the time period during which the perception of speech in noise and degraded speech markedly improves. The absence of N1 in cochlear implant subjects who have been deaf for a period of at least 3 years below the age of 6 years suggests a critical period in the maturation of the upper cortical layers and potentially poor future performance in the perception of masked and degraded speech.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations251
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Oto-LaryngologicaSame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207